Which statement is true about an acknowledgement on a deed signed by an attorney-in-fact for a spouse?

Which statement is true about an acknowledgement on a deed signed by an attorney-in-fact for a spouse?

• A. The acknowledgement alone proves authority.
• B. The acknowledgement is sufficient without any other evidence.
• C. Authority must appear in the chain of title.
• D. The acknowledgement creates an implied power.

Answer: (C)

When someone signs a deed for another person, you have to prove they had the authority to do so. The notary acknowledgment is only a form that confirms who signed and that the signature was voluntary; it does not establish that the signer had the right to act for the other person. To be valid and recordable, the authority must be shown in the chain of title—typically by the deed itself stating that the signer is acting under a power of attorney or by a recorded power of attorney that expressly grants that authority. There is no implied power from merely signing a deed. So the true statement is that authority must appear in the chain of title.

When someone signs a deed for another person, you have to prove they had the authority to do so. The notary acknowledgment is only a form that confirms who signed and that the signature was voluntary; it does not establish that the signer had the right to act for the other person. To be valid and recordable, the authority must be shown in the chain of title—typically by the deed itself stating that the signer is acting under a power of attorney or by a recorded power of attorney that expressly grants that authority. There is no implied power from merely signing a deed. So the true statement is that authority must appear in the chain of title.